Jane Austen in 'North & South': A Source Study
When first reading or watching Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South, audiences immediately
draw connections to Jane Austen’s Pride
and Prejudice as both main plot lines follow a couple hindered in the
development of their relationship by pride, prejudice, and bad first
impressions, accompanied by a contemptuous refusal,
a gradual self-awareness, and a suspenseful reunion. Accordingly, North and South has aptly been called an
industrial Pride and Prejudice. However,
as various critics have found through deeper studies, the correlations between
Jane Austen and North and South far
exceed this basic plot.
Superficially, North
and South and Gaskell’s other works’ titles seem to more closely reflect
Austen’s titles than those of her contemporary authors (Dickens, Bronte,
Trollope, etc.). More in depth, North and
South employs both Austen’s use of place names to describe the central
setting, such as Mansfield Park and Northanger Abbey, and her frequent use
of two contradictory or otherwise comparative terms that are significantly
prevalent to the plot. As in Pride and
Prejudice and Sense and Sensibility,
the heated debates in North and South
focus on the couple’s opinions on the two attributes given in the work’s title.
Ann Banfield draws on the title’s locality when she compares
North and South to Mansfield Park. “Margaret, like Fanny,
confronts a new place as an outsider. North
and South, like Mansfield Park,
has a place name as a title, and the novel is built on the same contrasts of
place, now seen on a larger scale. With the Austen heroine’s weak father,
Margaret finds she is on her own in Milton. Like Fanny, she discovers in
returning home that she sees it from a different—an outsider’s—perspective and
she cannot stay. But the place of the utopian future is reversed; it is the
enlarged and industrialized city. The chapter ‘Looking South’ is a ‘Looking
Backwards’; the contrast it seems between industrial North and rural
aristocratic South is one between present and an irrecoverable past” (45). In
some ways, the latter contemplation of Banfield’s unknowingly reflects Sense and Sensibility. The Dashwoods
find themselves leaving their prosperous life to live in a cottage which could
be compared to Margaret’s new, unwelcoming home in the North. However much the
Dashwoods miss and long for their old life and home, they eventually come to
grow into their new home. Their past becomes irrecoverable beyond the physical
just as Margaret’s own past becomes irrecoverable even though she does
temporarily return to Hampshire and London.
Banfield also says that North
and South “opens as an Austen novel, in her South, first fashionable London
and then pastoral Hampshire. There the heroine, Margaret Hale, like Austen the
daughter of a village clergyman, receives a proposal of marriage from an Austen
hero, Henry Lennox” (45-46). Other character and situational connections, as blog
writer “Janeite Deb” points out, are the common silliness between Fanny
Thornton and Lydia Bennet, Mrs. Thornton’s and Lady Catherine’s chastising
reproofs of the falsely accused heroines, and Thornton’s and Darcy’s actions to
protect Margaret and Lizzie from scandal and shame.
Gaskell
never admitted to any influence from Jane Austen and her works, but the
similarities cannot be ignored and due to the instant popularity of Austen’s
works upon their publication, it’s unlikely that Gaskell was unfamiliar with
them. Therefore, Austen ought to be considered as a source for North and South, as least a source of
inspiration.
Comments
Post a Comment